Does it make me a bad person that I just can’t get worked up about the word “inerrancy”? Most people in the church I grew up in probably have never heard the word. That’s ok. Some people have a problem with the connotation of the word — that it’s overly-precise or connotes a sort of scientific view of Scripture that’s not in view when we’re talking about truthfulness. That’s ok with me too. Some people don’t like it because it refers, as a technical term, to manuscripts we don’t possess (namely the autographs or original copies). I totally get the hesitation. If someone isn’t rejecting the larger understanding of the truthfulness of Scripture or using a non-inerrantist position to excuse disobedience to God’s word, I honestly can’t make myself care that they discard the term itself. Is that wrong?
Someone is probably going to knock on my door in a minute and take away my Young, Restless, and Reformed card.